To scotpel3,
Being kicked off eBay is now the primary penalty for fraudulent sellers, and that's pretty lame.
Although eBay occasionally brags about law enforcement acivity against the worst of the sellers, a careful reading of those reports show that legal action typically does not originate with eBay, but rather they simply cooperate with the authorities, which is really doing the bare minimum required, nothing to brag about.
Faced with that, would you open the door for every bad seller to simply return to eBay claiming to be someone else, removing the only (minor) penalty? Plenty of them already sneak back, it's one of the biggest weaknesses in the system because eBay doesn't seem to have an effective system for identifying these offenders, so some of them have had careers spanning several years.
EBay does, however, respond to reports by concerned participants, and are interested in any identities connected to a NARU'ed seller.
Have you seen any remorse expressed over the illegal actions of jonathandean8, the forged covers that were sold, or any effort to compensate the victims? No, instead they were contacted to point out that there was a new eBay identity, lewisxkahn, who was prepared to fleece them again, just in case they hadn't discovered that their first purchases were fraudulent.
The modus operandi has been the same - improper references to charity fundraising, hidden shipping costs, word spamming, items such as the Verve lithographs that indicated that the same seller was at work - and remember that eBay did their own investigation of the identities so they obviously found reasonable cause for the suspension.
The best thing to say is, jonathandean8 spoiled the chances for these sellers, which is as it should be, especially when there is ample reason to suspect that there is really only just one person involved.
Theft by fraud is a serious crime, the penalty so far has been lenient, and it took too long for jd8 to be NARU'ed.
It was apparent when "Stacey" appeared here that an appeal would probably be made for the selling to continue, since the only discomfort to "lewis" was the inconvenience of listing auctions that were whacked, and the seller didn't want that to happen again.
And that's how it has played out, no surprise. Even if the seller now has decided to post honest listings, tough beans. It was wrong to victimize honest buyers by offering bogus covers as genuine, and the recent purchases of cheap covers made by the seller(s) indicate no intention to change from that pattern.
Any eBay identities connected to the bad seller should be NARU'ed and they can go see jd8 for sympathy - if it's possible for a person to cry on one's own shoulder.
I'm just saying...
-Dunc
|